@article{albrecht2018, title = {Perceptions of Nonprofits and For-Profit Social Enterprises: {{Current}} Trends and Future Implications}, author = {Albrecht, Kate and Varkey, Sapna and Colville, Kathleen and Clerkin, Richard}, date = {2018}, journaltitle = {The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership}, shortjournal = {The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, publisher = {Sagamore Publishing LLC}, issn = {2374-7838}, doi = {10.18666/JNEL-2018-V8-I3-9134} } @article{albrecht2018a, title = {Institutional {{Logics}} and {{Accountability}}: {{Advancing}} an {{Integrated Framework}} in {{Nonprofit}}–{{Public Partnerships}}}, shorttitle = {Institutional {{Logics}} and {{Accountability}}}, author = {Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2018-12-01}, journaltitle = {Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs}, shortjournal = {J. Public Nonprof Aff.}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, pages = {284--305}, issn = {2381-3717}, doi = {10.20899/jpna.4.3.284-305}, url = {https://www.jpna.org/index.php/jpna/article/view/160}, urldate = {2026-04-06}, abstract = {Public and nonprofit management literature has focused more on formal accountability and less on emerging informal structures that are present in the pilot stages of partnerships. This study uses a phenomenological approach to examine the institutional logics of partner organizations and offers an integrated framework for how these logics may translate into accountability structures in a nonprofit—public partnership (NPPP). This framework advances a basis for the mechanisms present when an individual organization’s or agency’s institutional logics must be reconciled in the context of accountability. The analysis points to emerging challenges and cross pressures within the NPPP that are driving a need for comprehensive evaluation measures, established processes for business planning, and written agreements such as memorandums of understanding to provide clear definitions of partnership roles. Public managers designing or joining pilot partnerships need to be aware that mismatched institutional logics and perceptions of accountability can occur, and these dynamics may lead to a variety of hybrid measures to ensure future sustainability of interorganizational relationships.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\2BFB4SF4\Albrecht - 2018 - Institutional Logics and Accountability Advancing an Integrated Framework in Nonprofit–Public Partn.pdf} } @article{albrecht2020, title = {Can {{Managers Get}} It {{Right}}? {{Examining}} the {{Crossroads}} of {{Accountability}} and {{Measurement}}}, author = {Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2020}, publisher = {Oxford University Press US}, issn = {1053-1858} } @inbook{albrecht2021, title = {Longitudinal {{Network Analysis}} with {{RSiena}}}, booktitle = {Data {{Analytics}} for the {{Social Sciences}}: {{Applications}} in {{R}}}, author = {Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2021}, publisher = {Routledge Press}, bookauthor = {Garson, G. David} } @article{albrecht2022, title = {Shapeshifting to Address Complexity: {{Advancing}} a Typology of Network Evolution and Transformation}, shorttitle = {Shapeshifting to Address Complexity}, author = {Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2022-04-12}, journaltitle = {Complexity, Governance \& Networks}, shortjournal = {CGN}, volume = {8}, number = {1}, pages = {25}, issn = {2214-3009, 2214-2991}, doi = {10.20377/cgn-116}, url = {https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/116}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {In practice, health and social services are delivered through purpose-oriented networks (PONs) that are often favored by government and philanthropic investment as an effective means for collectively solving complex social problems. Current theories examine the evolution of these groups by resting on the traditional organizational forms of market, hierarchy, and network, without a consideration of trajectories that show movement between organizational forms over time. This article utilizes the network itself as the unit of analysis within a larger network domain to examine the most common trajectories and changes in organizational forms over time. To date, little theory has been developed or applied to account for both endogenous characteristics and exogenous system-wide dynamics and their longitudinal effects on networks. As is appropriate in the early stages of developing new theories, this article addresses the foundational steps of first clarifying the phenomenon of interest with the creation of a typology of the ways in which networks evolve as organizational forms and suggesting future network-level and network domain research agendas.}, langid = {english}, file = {C\:\\Users\\kalbrech\\Zotero\\storage\\FP2NPDLL\\Albrecht - 2022 - Shapeshifting to address complexity Advancing a typology of network evolution and transformation.pdf;C\:\\Users\\kalbrech\\Zotero\\storage\\HEWHUEEA\\pkpadmin,+220102Albrecht116_550_1PB1kor1_A3a.pdf} } @report{albrecht2022a, title = {Water for You and Me, or Water for Us? {{Regional}} Collaboration in Drinking Water Systems}, author = {Albrecht, Kate and Michnick, Jason}, date = {2022}, institution = {Syracuse University}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\V2A7YIMJ\Albrecht - Water for you and me, or water for us Regional co.pdf} } @incollection{albrecht2023, title = {Inductive {{Survey Research}}}, booktitle = {The {{Sage Handbook}} of {{Survey Development}} and {{Application}}}, author = {Albrecht, Kate and Archibold, Estelle}, editor = {Ford, Lucy and A., Terri}, date = {2023}, pages = {93--108}, publisher = {SAGE Publications Ltd}, url = {https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529617757.n7} } @article{albrecht2024, title = {Fiscal Institutions and Racial Equity: {{Determining}} the Price of Water}, shorttitle = {Fiscal Institutions and Racial Equity}, author = {Albrecht, Kate and Carroll, Deborah A. and Kass, Amanda and Michnick, Jason and Wetmore, Brooke}, date = {2024-06}, journaltitle = {Public Budgeting \& Finance}, shortjournal = {Public Budgeting \& Finance}, volume = {44}, number = {2}, pages = {45--68}, issn = {0275-1100, 1540-5850}, doi = {10.1111/pbaf.12361}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbaf.12361}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {Municipal water utilities across the United States establish their own rate structures to cover operations, maintenance, depreciation, and outstanding debt repayment. Yet, little is known about how rates are determined to ensure equity and/ or affordability. To identify sources of variation in residential drinking water rates, we examine municipalities in northeastern Illinois, 2015–2019. Controlling for water utility characteristics, billing structures, financial management, service quality, and demographic/socioeconomic factors, we find no statistically significant correlations between water rates and median household income or race when nonrevenue water from leaking infrastructure is considered, revealing relative racial equity in water pricing within these communities. A larger water distribution network, more water included in the base charge, and a greater number of months in the billing cycle are all associated with lower rates. Purchasing water through an individual or cooperative agreement, a greater proportion of nonrevenue water from leaking infrastructure, a higher minimum monthly base charge, and more revenue debt outstanding (while controlling for nonrevenue water) are all associated with higher rates. We also find a positive correlation between municipal sewer rates and drinking water rates that supports findings from prior research. Overall, our research aids in the development of public policy that ensures all households have access to affordable and safe drinking water to promote water equity and public health.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\64LDEBL6\Albrecht et al. - 2024 - Fiscal institutions and racial equity Determining the price of water.pdf} } @report{albrecht2025, title = {Mapping {{Chicago}} and {{Cook County}}'s {{Health Networks}} - 2025 {{Project Report}}}, author = {Albrecht, Kate and Zhang, Shuwen and Zehra, Mashal-E- and Lal, Yashaswi and Ko, Seohyeon and Jefferson, Trinity and Xia, Weiqi and Gutiérrez‐Meave, Raul and Mahia, James}, date = {2025}, institution = {{UIC Networks and Governance Lab}}, location = {Chicago, IL}, doi = {https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5744202} } @article{coupet2020, title = {Collaborative {{Value}} in {{Public}} and {{Nonprofit Strategic Alliances}}: {{Evidence From Transition Coaching}}}, shorttitle = {Collaborative {{Value}} in {{Public}} and {{Nonprofit Strategic Alliances}}}, author = {Coupet, Jason and Albrecht, Kate and Williams, Teshanee and Farruggia, Sue}, date = {2020-03}, journaltitle = {Administration \& Society}, shortjournal = {Administration \& Society}, volume = {52}, number = {3}, pages = {405--430}, issn = {0095-3997, 1552-3039}, doi = {10.1177/0095399719834270}, url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095399719834270}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {The value created by public–nonprofit (PNP) alliances often emphasizes public sector service delegation to nonprofits, but public and nonprofit organizations often seek to create shared social value with alliances, particularly in sectors where there is coproduction. To better understand shared social value, we apply the Collaborative Value Creation (CVC) framework to investigate value creation in the Transition Coaching sector—nonprofit organizations that provide support to high school students as they transition to college. We interview public and nonprofit executives and staff and find that nonprofits seek resources to help navigate complex bureaucratic public structures related to private client information and centralizing bureaucratic information. We also find shared public and nonprofit value in improving client navigation, knowledge sharing within public bureaucratic structures, and capacity building. Future scholarship should develop the potential for reduced bureaucratic frictions as a point of shared value in PNP alliances.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\GJ6NSYJ9\Coupet et al. - 2020 - Collaborative Value in Public and Nonprofit Strategic Alliances Evidence From Transition Coaching.pdf} } @report{crum2023, type = {Reearch funded by Grand Victoria Foundation}, title = {Illinois {{Racial Justice}} \& {{Equity Landscape Study}}}, author = {Crum, Thea and Faydash, Katherine and Slade, Adam and Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2023}, pages = {60}, institution = {UIC Great Cities Institute}, location = {Chicago} } @article{kurtz2026, title = {Network {{Embeddedness}} and {{Monitoring Mechanisms}} in {{Government-Nonprofit Public Service Delivery Agreements}}}, author = {Kurtz, Samuel and Shafiq, Saman and Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2026-01-12}, journaltitle = {The American Review of Public Administration}, shortjournal = {The American Review of Public Administration}, issn = {0275-0740, 1552-3357}, doi = {10.1177/02750740251411848}, url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02750740251411848}, urldate = {2026-03-06}, abstract = {We examine monitoring decisions made by governments when delivering services with nonprofit organizations in formal agreements. Our analysis suggests that the breadth of monitoring mechanisms that governments employ is more complex than shown in previous studies. We coded agreements in accordance with mechanisms identified in extant literature and employed inductive content analysis to establish 37 previously unexplored monitoring mechanisms. We next test the impact of governments’ and nonprofits’ network embeddedness on the use of these mechanisms across various institutional forms used in service delivery arrangements. Our research finds that governments increase monitoring when contracting out services in a “Service for Hire” arrangement and decrease monitoring when they are more embedded in their service delivery network. Motivated by questions of nonprofit reputation, we also find that the degree to which nonprofits are themselves connected to well connected actors reduces their monitoring burden. Further, we find that governments impose an increased monitoring burden in competitive environments while transaction costs have no unique significant effect on monitoring decisions. These findings reveal the amount of monitoring that governments use when more embedded within service delivery networks, and distinct avenues for obtaining information about nonprofits and the norms for monitoring them influence the regulatory burden imposed on nonprofits seeking to collaborate with governments.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\27D7IXG8\Kurtz et al. - 2026 - Network Embeddedness and Monitoring Mechanisms in Government-Nonprofit Public Service Delivery Agree.pdf} } @article{litvak2026, title = {Advancing a Transdisciplinary Approach for a Paradigm Shift in Water Management in {{US}} Cities}, author = {Litvak, Elizaveta and Groffman, Peter M and Vörösmarty, Charles J and Stoler, Justin B and Famiglietti, James S and Albrecht, Kate and Bixler, R Patrick}, date = {2026-03-01}, journaltitle = {Environmental Research: Water}, shortjournal = {Environ. Res.: Water}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {013001}, issn = {3033-4942}, doi = {10.1088/3033-4942/ae3acb}, url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae3acb}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {Under increasing influence of climate change, more frequent and intense droughts and floods are becoming reality for both wet and dry cities across the US, threatening water supply security and straining flood management systems. Paradigm shifts and novel approaches to urban water management are critically needed to navigate these new hydroclimatic realities. We develop a vision of a convergent, transdisciplinary approach to addressing urban water challenges by integrating knowledge, frameworks, and methods from relevant disciplines. We discuss that engaging with local communities to understand their specific needs, challenges, adaptation efforts, and attitudes toward water management practices is a key to effectively addressing urban water issues. We discuss characteristic aspects and shortcomings of current water management in US cities, addressing urban water infrastructure as social-ecological-technological systems and discussing green, gray, and social infrastructure, the physical boundaries of urban water processes, the transition to new forms of urban water management and governance, equity and inequalities in urban water management, and the new urban water management paradigm in the context of current global and societal challenges.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\QSVC4DPD\Litvak et al. - 2026 - Advancing a transdisciplinary approach for a paradigm shift in water management in US cities.pdf} } @article{medwid2025, title = {The {{Hidden Household Water Affordability Burden}}: {{An Examination}} of {{Municipal Ordinances}} and {{Racial Equity}}}, shorttitle = {The {{Hidden Household Water Affordability Burden}}}, author = {Medwid, Laura and Huang, Dan and Carroll, Deborah A. and Khalaf, Christelle and Albrecht, Kate and Li, Jun}, date = {2025-07}, journaltitle = {The American Review of Public Administration}, shortjournal = {The American Review of Public Administration}, volume = {55}, number = {5}, pages = {456--471}, issn = {0275-0740, 1552-3357}, doi = {10.1177/02750740251340063}, url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02750740251340063}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {The provision of affordable, high-quality residential water services is necessary for community health and well-being. Yet, the time-intensive nature of data collection and inconsistent public availability of ordinances online make research on water policy an often overlooked aspect of municipal governance. This study investigates the intersection of municipal water policy, equity, and accessibility by analyzing the hidden household burdens associated with establishing water service, nonpayment penalties, and assistance programs. By systematically analyzing municipal ordinances, this study uses regression analysis to better understand the relationship between these fees, penalties, and affordability programs in reference to community demographics, water system characteristics, and municipal financial indicators. Extant research reveals social and demographic disparities in water rates. This study extends those findings, highlighting inequities in water provision policies beyond routine billing. Communities with higher percentages of minorities have more burdensome water provision policies including higher water service deposit requirements, fewer days to pay before disconnection of water services, and higher reconnection fees after disconnection. Only 22.7\% of municipalities detail payment assistance programs in their ordinances, with availability more common in municipalities with greater fiscal capacity, transparency, and a higher percentage of minority populations. While higher poverty rates are associated with delayed shutoff timelines, stricter shutoff policies exist in communities with state revolving fund (SRF) financing, higher home values, and a higher proportion of renters. These patterns reveal systemic inequities in water affordability, emphasizing the importance of oversight and policy reform.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\LVQWZV8V\Medwid et al. - 2025 - The Hidden Household Water Affordability Burden An Examination of Municipal Ordinances and Racial E.pdf} } @article{medwid2026, title = {Investigating Residential Drinking Water Bills across Small and Medium-Sized Municipal Systems}, author = {Medwid, Laura and Albrecht, Kate and Carroll, Deborah Anne and Khalaf, Christelle and Huang, Dan and Li, Jun and Mitchnick, Jason and Zoh, Daniel}, date = {2026-04}, journaltitle = {Utilities Policy}, shortjournal = {Utilities Policy}, volume = {99}, pages = {102138}, issn = {09571787}, doi = {10.1016/j.jup.2025.102138}, url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095717872500253X}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {Empirical studies of water utilities often focus on large urban systems, in part because data on smaller providers are limited. This paper contributes to the literature on small and medium-sized water systems by leveraging novel data collected through direct outreach to primary governmental community water systems (CWSs) in Illinois, outside the Chicago Metropolitan Area. Specifically, the analysis focuses on municipalities that provide drinking water to populations of 10,000 or fewer. Using a hierarchical linear model that accounts for similarities among CWSs inherent to reliance on comparable water sources and provision methods, the paper examines how system attributes, billing policy and practices, infrastructure financing, and municipal characteristics relate to standardized residential water bills. The findings suggest that rate structure types, billing frequency, sewer service provision, and peer pricing are correlated with water bills issued by small- and medium-sized systems. Further, water source and provision characteristics are strongly associated with water bills, with municipalities sourcing from groundwater charging the least, compared to other source and provision categories. Overall, except for average household size, municipal characteristics are not associated with water bills.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\KKQ9PEV9\Medwid et al. - 2026 - Investigating residential drinking water bills across small and medium-sized municipal systems.pdf} } @article{michnick2022, title = {Networked {{Supply Chains}}: {{Describing}} the Costs of {{Lake Michigan Drinking Water}}}, author = {Michnick, Jason and Albrecht, Kate and Carroll, Deborah and Kass, Amanda and Wetmore, Brooke}, date = {2022}, journaltitle = {Illinois Municipal Policy Journal}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {29--48}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\G6B7UPYW\Michnick et al. - NETWORKED SUPPLY CHAINS DESCRIBING THE COSTS OF LAKE MICHIGAN’S DRINKING WATER.pdf} } @article{nowell2018, title = {Studying Networks in Complex Problem Domains: {{Advancing}} Methods in Boundary Specification}, author = {Nowell, Branda and Velez, Anne-Lise K and Hano, Mary Clare and Sudweeks, Jayce and Albrecht, Kate and Steelman, Toddi}, date = {2018}, journaltitle = {Perspectives on Public Management and Governance}, shortjournal = {Perspectives on Public Management and Governance}, volume = {1}, number = {4}, pages = {273--282}, publisher = {Oxford University Press US}, issn = {2398-4910} } @article{nowell2019, title = {A Reviewer’s Guide to Qualitative Rigor}, author = {Nowell, Branda and Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2019}, journaltitle = {Journal of public administration research and theory}, shortjournal = {Journal of public administration research and theory}, volume = {29}, number = {2}, pages = {348--363}, publisher = {Oxford University Press US}, issn = {1053-1858}, doi = {10.1093/jopart/muy052} } @article{nowell2022, title = {Co-Management during Crisis: Insights from Jurisdictionally Complex Wildfires}, shorttitle = {Co-Management during Crisis}, author = {Nowell, Branda and Steelman, Toddi and Velez, Anne-lise and Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2022-05-25}, journaltitle = {International Journal of Wildland Fire}, volume = {31}, number = {5}, pages = {529--544}, issn = {1049-8001, 1448-5516}, doi = {10.1071/WF21139}, url = {https://connectsci.au/wf/article/31/5/529/21839/Co-management-during-crisis-insights-from}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {There is a general agreement within the wildfire community that exclusively top–down approaches to policy making and management are limited and that we need to build governance capacity to cooperatively manage across jurisdictional boundaries. Accordingly, the concept of co-management has grown in popularity as a theoretical lens through which to understand cooperative multi-jurisdictional response to wildland fires. However, definitional ambiguity has led to on-going debates about what co-management is. Further, there is limited understanding about the nature of co-management during crisis events. This had led to scholars posing the question: what is co-management in the context of jurisdictionally complex wildfire? In this paper, we seek to address this question based on interviews with leaders engaged in the management of jurisdictionally complex wildfire incidents. We propose a multi-level framework for conceiving co-management as strategic efforts of individual actors to cooperatively manage perceived interdependencies with others through one or more formal or informal institutional arrangements. We then demonstrate the value of the proposed framework in its ability to organise a series of questions for diagnosing co-management situations within the context of jurisdictionally complex wildfires.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\K73WIYPE\Nowell et al. - 2022 - Co-management during crisis insights from jurisdictionally complex wildfires.pdf} } @article{nowell2024, title = {A Population Ecology of Network Domains}, author = {Nowell, Branda and Albrecht, Kate}, date = {2024-08-02}, journaltitle = {Public Management Review}, shortjournal = {Public Management Review}, volume = {26}, number = {8}, pages = {2218--2241}, issn = {1471-9037, 1471-9045}, doi = {10.1080/14719037.2023.2182903}, url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2023.2182903}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {Purpose-oriented networks (PONs) are a crucial and prevalent forum for addressing complex public issues. Using a longitudinal bipartite dataset of 74 PONs nested in three different geographic areas, we test a series of hypotheses, based in population ecology theories, concerning the impact of domain-level dynamics on network-level outcomes. Findings offer substantial support for, and insight into, the relevance of population-level dynamics in explaining organizational, network, and domain-level changes over time. Findings further offer practical insight and a cautionary tale for public and philanthropic initiatives that incentivize or mandate the formation of new PONs in a network domain.}, langid = {english}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\E6A6XQNN\Nowell and Albrecht - 2024 - A population ecology of network domains.pdf} } @article{shafiq2023, title = {Extending the {{Interdependence Theory}} to {{Local Public Service Provision}}: {{Evidence}} from {{Iowa}}}, shorttitle = {Extending the {{Interdependence Theory}} to {{Local Public Service Provision}}}, author = {Shafiq, Saman and Albrecht, Kate and LeRoux, Kelly}, date = {2023-07-19}, journaltitle = {Nonprofit Policy Forum}, volume = {14}, number = {3}, pages = {255--278}, issn = {2154-3348}, doi = {10.1515/npf-2022-0036}, url = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/npf-2022-0036/html}, urldate = {2026-03-27}, abstract = {Lester Salamon’s interdependence theory has held up over time and across dozens of national contexts. However, the theory has largely been developed through data on government partnerships with nonprofits for providing social services. While government-nonprofit partnerships exist in various service areas and policy contexts, the theory has rarely been applied in less “traditional” service settings. We apply a mixed-method sequential research design – empirical analysis followed by a comparative case analysis – to understand the descriptive and explanatory power of Salamon’s interdependence theory and to differentiate its applications from other theories of government-nonprofit partnerships. Our analysis shows that nonprofits are extensively engaged in public service delivery at the local level, partnering with county and municipal governments to carry out essential public services well beyond the scope of social welfare functions and human services. Expanding the concept of interdependence theory, our findings further show that in local service delivery settings, there is a unique balancing of aspects of both voluntary and government failure that can be achieved.}, langid = {english}, file = {C\:\\Users\\kalbrech\\Zotero\\storage\\5ETRQR9J\\Shafiq et al. - 2023 - Extending the Interdependence Theory to Local Public Service Provision Evidence from Iowa.pdf;C\:\\Users\\kalbrech\\Zotero\\storage\\TL5X995X\\Shafiq et al. - 2023 - Extending the Interdependence Theory to Local Publ.pdf} } @incollection{varkey2024, title = {Performance {{Measurement}} and {{Management}} to {{Improve Human Resource Management}}}, booktitle = {Managing {{Human Resources}} in the {{Nonprofit Sector}}: {{Equipping Organizations}} to Be {{Democratic}}, {{Diverse}}, {{Inclusive}}, and {{Employee-Friendly}}}, author = {Varkey, Sapna and Albrecht, Kate}, editor = {Kuenzi, Kerry and Stewart, Amanda J.}, date = {2024}, publisher = {Sagamore Press}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\KWDCXXDU\Varkey and Albrecht_2023.pdf} } @incollection{velez2024, title = {Unpacking Informal Partnerships and Intangible Resources in Co-Creation of Community}, booktitle = {Social ({{In}}) Equality, {{Community Well-being}} and {{Quality}} of {{Life}}}, author = {Velez, Anne-Lise K and Bodkin, Candice Pippin and Albrecht, Kate R and Patrick, Anne}, editor = {Kraeger, Patsy and Islam, M. Rezaul and Phillips, Rhonda}, date = {2024}, pages = {350--363}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, isbn = {1-0353-1245-X}, file = {C:\Users\kalbrech\Zotero\storage\U24LD39S\Velez et al. - 2024 - Unpacking informal partnerships and intangible resources in co-creation of community.pdf} }